top of page
Search

Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) - a solution for emissions from industry and power plants

Writer's picture: Taylor HickemTaylor Hickem

Source : IPCC 2005 special report on carbon capture and storage

So just to be clear, CCS isn’t experimental – it’s a reworking of existing oil and gas technologies.
- David Hone, Shell Chief Climate Change Advisor

CCS is a technique of burning fossil fuels in a way that does not contribute to greenhouse gas accumulation in the atmosphere by capturing the carbon dioxide and geologically storing it for a long time 100-1,000 years.


Application of CCS to Singapore's emissions

Of Singapore's greenhouse gas inventory 60% is from manufacturing and combined with the natural gas power plants could reduce 80% of territorial emissions. 7-20% of Singapore's GDP can be attributed to the petrochemical industry on Jurong and Bukom Island and employs around 60,000 workers directly and indirectly. Business-as-usual for Singapore means identifying solutions that would have the least disruptive impact to the people from these industries. CCS offers a bridge technological solution for transitioning these industries long term while meeting Paris Agreement targets in the short term. The added capture process adds an "energy penalty" of +20% which is the additional level of energy input to achieve the same level of power utilized compared to the level without CCS. Based on literature sources (Global Carbon Institute) CCS may be a cost-effective solution for carbon price in the range of USD $60-100/ton CO2.


Research on CCS by the Singapore government's

The technology of CCS has been investigated for application to Singapore's industrial and natural gas power plant emissions by NRF under the directive of the National Climate Change Secretariat. The findings are published in the report "Carbon Capture Storage and Utilisation Singapore Perspectives" which was originally published in 2014 and a later version updated in 2019. The findings of the report are consistent with literature, although some of the cost estimates report a wider uncertainty range USD $78-230/ton.


Singapore government official response to CCS CCS is identified as the fourth of Singapore's "4-switches" (Low, 2020) and acknowledged its importance in Long Term Low Emissions Development Strategy (LEDS). Response by the NCCS to public feedback suggestions to implement the technology in the near term to meet 2030 obligations highlighted 3 areas as primary concerns for further follow-up (NCCS, 2020).

  1. capture costs $78-230/ton

  2. operational energy penalty +20%

  3. access to permanent storage locations

The projected costs, and efficiency reduction vs time are available from literature reports and are considered to be mostly a limit set by thermodynamics, and are not expected to dramatically improve beyond what is already forecasted. Permanent storage locations while abundant in ASEAN region as with all other imported items of food, natural gas, and labour -- the issue of storage access also must be added to foreign policy agenda with regional neighbors in order to realize the opportunity.


A complete review of the technology is presented in the full report along with references including comparison between pre and post combustion, review of existing demonstration units around the world in Texas, Norway and Japan technical information about scale-up considerations on storage, such as leakage risk and global long term capacity.


References


Aaron, Douglas, 2011 Separation of CO2 from flue gas - a review


De Lucia, EH, 1999 Net Primary Production of a Forest Ecosystem with Experimental CO2 Enrichment


Doctor, RH, 2001 Transporting carbon dioxide recovered from fossil fuel energy cycles


Global CCS Institute, 2017 The global status of CCS


Hawken, Paul, 2014 Project Drawdown


Herzog, H.J., 2000 Economics of carbon capture


Holloway, Sam, 2001 Storage of fossil fuel derived carbon dioxide beneath the surface of the earth


House, K.Z. 2009 Energy penalty of post combustion CO2 capture

IPCC, 2010 Special Report on Carbon Capture and Sequestration


Low, Melissa, 2020 "that low carbon future for Singapore is not so far fetched"


MIT - Sleipner West gas field case study, Accessed 22 Sep 2019


Nabuurs, G.J. 2001 Carbon profiles of typical forest types across Europe assessed with CO2FIX

National Climate Change Secretariat (NCCS) Singapore, 2014 Carbon Capture Storage and Utilisation Singapore Perspectives https://www.nccs.gov.sg/docs/default-source/default-document-library/carbon-capture-and-storage-utilisation-singapore-perspectives.pdf NCCS, 2020 "Response to feedback on Singapore's long term low emissions development strategy (LEDS)" https://www.nccs.gov.sg/public-consultation/response-to-feedback-on-singapore's-long-term-low-emissions-development-strategy/


Oelkers 2008 carbon dioxide sequestration - a solution to a global problem


Peng, 2012 Analysis of the Thermal Efficiency Limit of the Steam Methane Reforming Process


Rackley, Stephen A, 2010 "Ocean Storage", Carbon Capture and Storage


Yildirim M, 2009 Kinetics of Calcium Carbonate (CaCO3) Precipitation from a Icel‐Yavca

Dolomite Leach Solution by a Gas (Carbon Dioxide)/Liquid Reaction


Zhang Y, 2014 Energy consumption analysis for CO2 separation from gas

7 views0 comments

Comments


Post: Blog2_Post

©2022 by Green New Deal Singapore

bottom of page